Society Rules : Final Part
Against The Deniers
Although society rule need to be modified while not to decrease its cultural value among society as the beginning past have talked about, there are some groups or individual who against its modification. The modification can be like the government's policy, people initiative or at least the tolerant level toward minorities have to be increased. But this will not going to be easy.
The persons who will against the modification have reason that the change happen in people will effect their power as a group in a country or in some region. These people have its power in society by some conditions. First they are big and influential group among the people living there. Second the power that they use is real and can be seen as it force people to 'bound' before them. Third, the group is anarchist somehow which create a feeling of fear to the people who have a cross thinking. Fourth, the group who against the modification have a immense power which is invisible but its power is felt by the people. And fifth, as the obvious factor of making dispute, these groups have a different thought with the modification idea which somehow can not reach a solving point.
Facing the deniers or groups who initiate to undo this modification is a tough job. A brave and good individuate only will not solve this issue. It is needed to have a smart and efficient idea, brave and have a solid thinking person who can make the groups sit down together and talk about the problem while maintaining peace solving and finally finished with making memorandum. The point here is the modification still happen but it's modified again with a number of agreeable things between both of the side.
Mostly the groups who have intention to make modification end are groups who have deep background and have its influence one of important aspect such as the religion as the biggest aspect, politic, culture, or there is an importance that the group have in a region and it's vital for them.
There are mechanism to solve this problem as the world organization had done it before. But what make a big problem is the group can not agree with that mechanism since they are not adapted yet with the system. And also the group often make a ' labyrinth resolution' which make the mechanism process more difficult and can not reach to ending point.
As citizen, what we can do is to make our heart pointed to which decision is correct and defend it with fact and our ideas. Don't let the change happen with a bad resolution and imbalance policy.
Although society rule need to be modified while not to decrease its cultural value among society as the beginning past have talked about, there are some groups or individual who against its modification. The modification can be like the government's policy, people initiative or at least the tolerant level toward minorities have to be increased. But this will not going to be easy.
The persons who will against the modification have reason that the change happen in people will effect their power as a group in a country or in some region. These people have its power in society by some conditions. First they are big and influential group among the people living there. Second the power that they use is real and can be seen as it force people to 'bound' before them. Third, the group is anarchist somehow which create a feeling of fear to the people who have a cross thinking. Fourth, the group who against the modification have a immense power which is invisible but its power is felt by the people. And fifth, as the obvious factor of making dispute, these groups have a different thought with the modification idea which somehow can not reach a solving point.
Facing the deniers or groups who initiate to undo this modification is a tough job. A brave and good individuate only will not solve this issue. It is needed to have a smart and efficient idea, brave and have a solid thinking person who can make the groups sit down together and talk about the problem while maintaining peace solving and finally finished with making memorandum. The point here is the modification still happen but it's modified again with a number of agreeable things between both of the side.
Mostly the groups who have intention to make modification end are groups who have deep background and have its influence one of important aspect such as the religion as the biggest aspect, politic, culture, or there is an importance that the group have in a region and it's vital for them.
There are mechanism to solve this problem as the world organization had done it before. But what make a big problem is the group can not agree with that mechanism since they are not adapted yet with the system. And also the group often make a ' labyrinth resolution' which make the mechanism process more difficult and can not reach to ending point.
As citizen, what we can do is to make our heart pointed to which decision is correct and defend it with fact and our ideas. Don't let the change happen with a bad resolution and imbalance policy.
Komentar
Posting Komentar